Last Updated:
November 1, 2023
Case Summary: 3:16-cv-01421-WHO
The Complaint asserts the following claims against Defendants arising from their marketing and sale of bedding during the limitations period: (a) Misleading and Deceptive Advertising; (b) Untrue Advertising; (c) Unlawful Business Practices; (d) Breach of Express Warranty; (e) Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability; and (f) Unjust Enrichment.
Case Highlights
Case highlights for this case are not yet available.
Case-related documents, including those referenced above, are available via the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service. For more information, visit Pacer.gov.
Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Part 1)
![Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Part 1) Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Part 1), 3:16-cv-01421-WHO, Motion to Strike, Diversity, 11/1/2023, 12:00 PM (PDT), Phillip Burton U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building, San Francisco, CA, Judge William H. Orrick presiding.](/sites/all/modules/lazyloader/image_placeholder.gif)
Click to Play Video