Judicial Emergencies for May 2015
Judicial Emergencies | As of 05/01/2015 | ||||||
Circuit/District | Vacancy Created By | Reason | Vacancy Date | Days Pending | Weighted Filings per Judgeship* | Adjusted Filings per Panel* | |
02 - NYE | Garaufis,Nicholas G. | Senior | 10/01/2014 | 212 | 680 | ||
02 - NYE | Feuerstein,Sandra J. | Senior | 01/21/2015 | 100 | 680 | ||
03 - NJ | Hochberg,Faith S. | Retired | 03/06/2015 | 56 | 659 | ||
03 - NJ | Martini,William J. | Senior | 02/10/2015 | 80 | 659 | ||
03 - NJ | Pisano,Joel A. | Retired | 02/16/2015 | 74 | 659 | ||
03 - CCA | Scirica,Anthony J. | Senior | 07/01/2013 | 669 | 551 | ||
04 - NCE | Howard,Malcolm J. | Senior | 12/31/2005 | 3408 | 609 | ||
04 - SC | Currie,Cameron McGowan | Senior | 10/03/2013 | 575 | 437 | ||
05 - TXE | Schell,Richard A. | Senior | 03/10/2015 | 52 | 1226 | ||
05 - TXN | Means,Terry | Senior | 07/03/2013 | 667 | 581 | ||
05 - TXS | Tagle,Hilda G. | Senior | 12/31/2012 | 851 | 571 | ||
05 - TXS | Jack,Janis Graham | Senior | 06/01/2011 | 1430 | 571 | ||
05 - TXW | Junell,Robert A. | Senior | 02/13/2015 | 77 | 651 | ||
05 - CCA | King,Carolyn Dineen | Senior | 12/31/2013 | 486 | 939 | ||
05 - CCA | Garza,Emilio M. | Senior | 08/01/2012 | 1003 | 939 | ||
06 - TNM | Haynes Jr.,William Joseph | Senior | 12/01/2014 | 151 | 686 | ||
06 - CCA | Martin Jr.,Boyce F. | Retired | 08/16/2013 | 623 | 546 | ||
07 - INS | Barker,Sarah Evans | Senior | 06/30/2014 | 305 | 658 | ||
09 - CAC | Collins,Audrey B. | Retired | 08/01/2014 | 273 | 663 | ||
09 - CAE | Ishii,Anthony Wayne | Senior | 10/31/2012 | 912 | 1006 | ||
11 - ALM | Thompson,Myron H. | Senior | 08/22/2013 | 617 | 511 | ||
11 - FLS | Rosenbaum,Robin S. | Elevated | 05/12/2014 | 354 | 710 | ||
11 - CCA | Dubina,Joel F. | Senior | 10/26/2013 | 552 | 885 | ||
Total Emergencies = 23 | |||||||
*Adjusted Filings per Panel and Weighted Filings per Judgeship are Calendar Year Data | |||||||
A judicial emergency is defined as the following: | |||||||
Circuit Court | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
District Court | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
(1), In determining judgeship needs in the U.S. district courts, the Judicial Conference uses weighted filings | |||||||
as a means of accounting for differences in the time required for judges to resolve various types of civil and | |||||||
criminal actions. Rather than counting each case as a single case, weights are applied based on the nature of | |||||||
cases. For example, cases involving a defaulted student loan are counted as 0.031 for each case and patent cases | |||||||
are counted as 1.9 cases. The criminal weights are applied on a per-defendant basis. The total for | |||||||
"weighted filings per judgeship" is the sum of all weights assigned to civil cases and criminal defendants, | |||||||
divided by the number of authorized judgeships. | |||||||
(2), In the courts of appeals, adjusted filings are used in a similar manner to weighted filings in the district | |||||||
courts. Adjusted filings eliminate reinstated cases and weight pro se appeals as one-third of a case. All other | |||||||
cases have a weight of one. The total for "adjusted filings per panel" is adjusted filings divided by the number | |||||||
of authorized three-judge panels (authorized judgeships/3). |
Archived Judicial Vacancies for May 2015 |