Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Main Menu

Cox v. New Hampshire

This First Amendment activity is based on the Supreme Court landmark case Cox v. New Hampshire dealing with freedom of speech and assembly. Using these talking points to start the discussion, argue your position in answer to the question: Are certain restrictions on assembly unconstitutional?

Activity Resources
  1. Cox v. New Hampshire
  2. Facts and Case Summary: Cox v. New Hampshire
  3. Talking Points - Cox v. New Hampshire

About These Resources

How to Use These Resources

This activity is a modified Oxford style debate.

  1. To get started, have participants read the Cox v. New Hampshire facts and case summary.
  2. Assign student attorneys to the issues listed in the talking points. They are suggested points– not a script–for the debate. Student attorneys are encouraged to add their own arguments.
  3. All other students are jurors who deliberate (and may refer to these talking points) during the open floor debate. They debate among themselves in the large group or smaller groups and come to a verdict after the attorneys present closing arguments.

Activity Download

DISCLAIMER: These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only. They may not reflect the current state of the law, and are not intended to provide legal advice, guidance on litigation, or commentary on any pending case or legislation.