Main content

Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc

Last Updated: 
November 1, 2023

Case Summary: 3:16-cv-01421-WHO

The Complaint asserts the following claims against Defendants arising from their marketing and sale of bedding during the limitations period: (a) Misleading and Deceptive Advertising; (b) Untrue Advertising; (c) Unlawful Business Practices; (d) Breach of Express Warranty; (e) Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability; and (f) Unjust Enrichment.

Case Highlights

Case highlights for this case are not yet available.

Case-related documents, including those referenced above, are available via the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service. For more information, visit Pacer.gov.

Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Part 1)
Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Part 1), 3:16-cv-01421-WHO, Motion to Strike, Diversity, 11/1/2023, 12:00 PM (PDT), Phillip Burton U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building, San Francisco, CA, Judge William H. Orrick presiding.


Click to Play Video