Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Main Menu

In Food & Water Watch vs EPA

Court:
Northern District of California
Subject Matter:
Environmental/Land Use
Procedural Posture:
Motion to Lift Stay
Status Conference
Last Updated:
  • In Food & Water Watch vs EPA., 3:17-cv-02162-EMC
    In Food & Water Watch vs EPA., 3:17-cv-02162-EMC, Environmental/Land Use, 10/26/2022, 3:30PM, Phillip Burton U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building,, San Francisco, CA, Judge Edward Chen presiding.

    In Food & Water Watch vs EPA., 3:17-cv-02162-EMC, Environmental/Land Use, 10/26/2022, 3:30PM, Phillip Burton U.S...

  • In Food & Water Watch vs EPA (Part 2) 3:17-cv-02162-EMC
    In Food & Water Watch vs EPA., 3:17-cv-02162-EMC, Environmental/Land Use, 07/11/2023, 2:30PM, Phillip Burton U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building,, San Francisco, CA, Judge Edward Chen presiding.

    In Food & Water Watch vs EPA., 3:17-cv-02162-EMC, Environmental/Land Use, 07/11/2023, 2:30PM, Phillip Burton U.S...

Case Summary: 3:17-cv-02162-EMC

Plaintiffs petitioned the EPA under Section 21 to regulate the fluoridation of drinking water supplies under Section 6(a) because they maintain, the ingestion of fluoride poses an unreasonable risk of neurotoxic harm to humans. After the EPA denied Plaintiffs petition, Plaintiffs filed this suit seeking judicial review of the EPAs determination.

Case Highlights

Case highlights for this case are not yet available.

Case-related documents, including those referenced above, are available via the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service. For more information, visit Pacer.gov.