Last Updated:
November 15, 2019
Case Summary: 3:17-cv-02162-EMC
Plaintiffs petitioned the EPA under Section 21 to regulate the fluoridation of drinking water supplies under Section 6(a) because, they maintain, the ingestion of fluoride poses an unreasonable risk of neurotoxic harm to humans. After the EPA denied Plaintiffs petition, Plaintiffs filed this suit seeking judicial review of the EPAs determination.
Case Highlights
- Case highlights for this case is not yet available.
Case-related documents, including those referenced above, are available via the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service. For more information, visit Pacer.gov.
Food & Water Watch, Inc., et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Food & Water Watch, Inc. et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al, 3:17-cv-02162-EMC, Environmental/Land Use, Motion for Summary Judgment, 11/15/2019, 3:30PM, Philip Burton U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building, San Francisco, CA, Honorable Edward M. Chen presiding.
Click to Play Video